Google Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Google - Research Paper Example Termed as â€Å"BackRub† initially, this search engine was refined and modified. It later led to the creation of the company that the world admires today; Google. Google started operations from Susan Wojcicki‘s garage at 232 Santa Margarita, Menlo Park. The initial funds for the company were provided by Sun co-founder Andy Bechtolsheim. Larry and Sergey, the co-founders, hired their fellow graduate at Standford, Craig Silverstein, as their first employee. There has been no looking back ever since. By mid-1999, the company had, led by venture capitalists Sequoia Capital and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, completed a $25-million round of equity funding. In May 2010, the first 10 language versions of Google.com were released. The search engine was now available in French, German, Italian, Swedish, Finnish, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Norwegian and Danish. By September, Google had started offering search in 15 languages including Chinese, Japanese and Korean. In February of 2001, the company acquired Deja.com’s Usenet Discussion Service, an archive of 500 million Usenet discussions. The company opened its first international office in Tokyo in August 2001. By the end of the year, index size of Google grew to 3 billion web documents. In May 2002, Google inked a deal with AOL that enabled it to offer search and sponsored links to as many as 34 million customers who used CompuServe, Netscape and AOL.com. Google continued its inorganic route to expansion and acquired Pyra Labs, the creators of Blogger, in February 2003. One of the most important acquisitions of the company has been that of Applied Semantics, whose technology immensely bolstered Google’s content-targeted advertising service named Adsense. Google made its initial foray into the domain of social networking when it launched Orkut in January 2004. A couple of months later, the company moved to its new abode â€Å"Googleplex† at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway in Mountain View. In October 2004, the company acquired Keyhole, a digital mapping company. It was Keyhole’s technology that later helped Google launch Google Earth. By February 2005 Google had 1.1 billion images indexed. A month later, the company acquired a web analytics company, Urchin, whose technology is behind Google Analytics. The acquisition spree continued for Google in 2006 as it acquired dMarc, a digital radio advertising company in January, Writely, a web-based word processing application in March and JotSpot, a collaborative wiki platform in October. The company continued to expand its reach as it forged an alliance with China Mobile in January 2007. The deal enabled Google to provide mobile and Internet search services in China. The same year in June, the company announced a partnership with Salesforce.com, clubbing the latter’s on-demand CRM applications with its own AdWords. In September 2009, Google acquire reCAPTCHA, a technology company focused on Optical Character R ecognition (OCR). Picnik, a site that enables users to edit photos in the cloud, without leaving the browser, was acquired in March 2010. In February 2011, a new search algorithm that has a bearing on 11.8 percent of queries was refined to give better search results. Earlier this year, Google launched Google +, the company’s latest foray into the world of social network

Argument for Lowering The Drinking Age to 18 Essay

Argument for Lowering The Drinking Age to 18 - Essay Example Banning drinking age at 18 will not stop teenagers from drinking. Some adults may have the impression that since it is made illegal to drink at age 18, then it would stop teenagers from drinking. On the contrary, the prohibition will not stop teenagers from drinking and that will even add to the thrill of drinking alcohol. Instead of stopping it, the prohibition will even have the effect of encouraging teenagers to drink. Banning alcohol at age 18 will just make teenagers hide when they are drinking and it is more dangerous. Adults or supervising authority may have the impression that they have stopped drinking but in fact, the drinking just went underground. This time, teenagers drink without the presence of adult supervision and this an unsafe environment for kids to drink. It is in this environment that excesses happen that often leads to the fatal outcome that some college presidents have aired their concern that drinking underground contributes to alcohol excesses among teenagers (Wechsler, 2010 pg. 987). Also, it is in this environment that beer binges and fighting occurs because teenagers tend to seize the moment and drink a lot until they could no longer control themselves. Also, 18 years old does not differ from age 21 in terms of the judgment. People may argue that older is better but being 21 does not make one wiser in terms of alcohol drinking. Delaying drinking age to 21 years old does not make one a more responsible drinker. In fact, delaying it promotes an irresponsible drinking behavior because teenagers will have to hide drinking first before they can drink in the open at age 21. So by the time they are already legal to drink to age 21, they have already developed the habit of drinking excessively because they were used to drink in an unsafe environment.

Painting of Jackson Pollock Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Painting of Jackson Pollock - Essay Example A new, interactive and creative activity catches my attention for nearly a half an hour. Finally I give up and sink deep into the exciting world of colors, dots, lines and circles. Think and thin, short and long, bright and dull†¦ These colorful shapes are seducing the mind by the opportunity of becoming expressive, independent and original for at lest a few fun moments.Thought the first impression is that the activity of painting on the computer is just another entertaining experience, a second look makes me realize how cool our age is – the age of advanced technologies that allow any average individual to become, for at least some minutes, an artist. It’s so strange – a seemingly simple computer application makes the tired brain think of such great things as world progress, global development and even the essence of being. Dots – large and small, lines – straight and wavy, shapes†¦ And an inexpressible joy of creation.

Argument for Lowering The Drinking Age to 18 Essay

Argument for Lowering The Drinking Age to 18 - Essay Example Banning drinking age at 18 will not stop teenagers from drinking. Some adults may have the impression that since it is made illegal to drink at age 18, then it would stop teenagers from drinking. On the contrary, the prohibition will not stop teenagers from drinking and that will even add to the thrill of drinking alcohol. Instead of stopping it, the prohibition will even have the effect of encouraging teenagers to drink. Banning alcohol at age 18 will just make teenagers hide when they are drinking and it is more dangerous. Adults or supervising authority may have the impression that they have stopped drinking but in fact, the drinking just went underground. This time, teenagers drink without the presence of adult supervision and this an unsafe environment for kids to drink. It is in this environment that excesses happen that often leads to the fatal outcome that some college presidents have aired their concern that drinking underground contributes to alcohol excesses among teenagers (Wechsler, 2010 pg. 987). Also, it is in this environment that beer binges and fighting occurs because teenagers tend to seize the moment and drink a lot until they could no longer control themselves. Also, 18 years old does not differ from age 21 in terms of the judgment. People may argue that older is better but being 21 does not make one wiser in terms of alcohol drinking. Delaying drinking age to 21 years old does not make one a more responsible drinker. In fact, delaying it promotes an irresponsible drinking behavior because teenagers will have to hide drinking first before they can drink in the open at age 21. So by the time they are already legal to drink to age 21, they have already developed the habit of drinking excessively because they were used to drink in an unsafe environment.

Argue Analysis Worksheet Essay Example for Free

Argue Analysis Worksheet Essay †¢ A statement is any unambiguous declarative sentence about a fact (or non-fact) about the world. It says that something is (or isn’t) the case. †¢ An argument is a series of statements meant to establish a claim. †¢ A claim or conclusion is the statement whose truth an argument is meant to establish. †¢ A statement’s truth value is either true or false. o All statements have a truth value. A statement is false when what it says about the world is not actually the case. A statement is true when what it says about the world is actually the case. †¢ A premise is a statement that is used in an argument to establish a conclusion. What we can say about an argument: †¢ An argument is valid if its premises necessarily lead to its conclusion. That is, if you accept that the premises are all true, you must accept that the conclusion is true. †¢ An argument is sound if it is valid and you accept that all its premises are true. †¢ A good, convincing argument is a sound argument. That is, since you accept all the premises are true, you must accept the conclusion is true (because the argument is valid). †¢ A bad argument is any other kind of argument. Examples: †¢ â€Å"Every animal needs to breathe in order to live. Fish are animals. Fish cannot breathe in the air. Therefore, fish cannot live in the air.† Here, the claim is that â€Å"fish cannot live in the air.† The premises are â€Å"Every animal needs to breathe in order to live,† â€Å"Fish are animals,† and â€Å"Fish cannot breathe in the air.† The argument is valid – the premises necessarily lead to the conclusion. The argument is also sound – the premises are true. It is a good argument. †¢ â€Å"Oranges are green. All green things make me sick. Therefore, oranges make me sick.† The claim is â€Å"oranges make me sick.† The premises are â€Å"Oranges are green,† and â€Å"All green things make me sick.† The argument is valid – if we accept the premises, we are forced to accept the conclusion. However, the argument is not sound – oranges are not, in fact, green, so one of the premises is false. This is a bad argument. †¢ â€Å"Broccoli is green. Some green things make me sick. Therefore, broccoli makes me sick.† The claim is â€Å"broccoli makes me sick.† The premises are â€Å"Broccoli is green,† and â€Å"Some green things make me sick.† Here, all the premises are true. However, the argument is not valid – even if we accept the premises, we are not forced to accept the conclusion. Just because some green things are sickening does not mean that broccoli is. This is a bad or unsound argument. (Notice, it doesn’t make any difference whether or not broccoli makes me sick – whether or not the conclusion is true. Even if the conclusion is true, the premises have not given us reason to believe that it is true.) †¢ â€Å"Whales know how to play hockey. Therefore, Canadians like winter.† The claim is â€Å"Canadians like winter.† The premise is â€Å"Whales know how to play hockey.† The argument is neither valid nor sound. It’s a bad argument. (Again, it doesn’t make any difference whether the conclusion is true.) Part II: Analyzing an Argument Reconstructing the argument The examples I’ve given are overly simplistic. Usually arguments come in complicated prose. It is therefore difficult to figure out what the argument is, let alone whether it is good. Our first step is to reconstruct the argument. That is, we must convert the argument into a series of statements, identifying the premises and the conclusion and laying them out so that the premises lead to the conclusion. Take Socrates’s argument in the Apology: â€Å"For Death is to be as it were nothing, and to be deprived of all sensation And if no sensation remains, then death is like a dreamless sleep. In this case, death will be a blessing. For, if any one compares such a night as this, in which he so profoundly sleeps as not even to see a dream, with the other nights and days of his life, and should declare how many he had passed better and more pleasantly than this night, I think that not only a private man, but even the great king himself, would find so small a number that they might be easily counted.† The first step is to identify the conclusion. Go through the passage and try to find the point. What is Socrates trying to establish? It’s buried in there: â€Å"Death will be a blessing.† To proceed, we first have to get rid of anything unnecessary – mere rhetorical flourishes, repetitions, and irrelevancies. Go through the passage and get rid of anything that doesn’t support the conclusion in some way: â€Å"For Death is to be deprived of all sensation if no sensation remains, then death is like a dreamless sleep. death will be a blessing. if any one compares such a night [of sleep without dreams] with the other nights and days of his life, and should declare how many he had passed better and more pleasantly than this night, I think.. [he] would find so small a number† Once we’ve dispensed with what we don’t need, we can reformulate the argument as a series of statements: 1. Death is to be deprived of all sensation. 2. If no sensation remains, death is like a dreamless sleep. 3. Anyone will consider a dreamless sleep better than most days and nights. 4. Death is a blessing. Now we’re ready to add anything that seems to be missing. Are there any premises that seem to be assumed, but aren’t stated? 1. Death is to be deprived of all sensation. 2. If no sensation remains, death is like a dreamless sleep. 3. Death is like a dreamless sleep. 4. Anyone will consider a dreamless sleep better than most days and nights. 5. Anyone will consider death better than most days and nights. 6. Anything that is better than most days and nights is a blessing. 7. Death is a blessing. Now, we need to say something about the inference in the argument. We need to say how the argument is put together. We should identify assumed premises and sub-arguments – conclusions that are premises for the main conclusion. This will also help us to identify if anything else is missing. 1. Death is to be deprived of all sensation. (Assumption) 2. If no sensation remains, death is like a dreamless sleep. (Assumption) 3. Death is like a dreamless sleep. (Conclusion from 1 and 2) 4. Anyone will consider a dreamless sleep better than most days and nights. (Assumption) 5. Anyone will consider death better than most days and nights. (Conclusion from 3 and 4) 6. Anything that is better than most days and nights is a blessing. (Assumption) 7. Death is a blessing. (From 3, 5, and 6) At this point, we’ve completed the reconstruction of the argument. No reconstruction is perfect, and I don’t mean to suggest that this is the only possible reconstruction of Socrates’s argument. It just seems to me as if this is what Socrates is saying. If you disagree with my critique, you can always question the faithfulness of my reconstruction. That’s a standard philosophical move. Analyzing an Argument Once we’ve reconstructed an argument – shown what we think it is and how it is supposed to work – we can begin to say whether an argument is good or bad. We need to evaluate the argument’s validity and soundness. First, take a step back. Assume that you don’t have any prior opinion about the conclusion. In this case, are you convinced? If you are, then you need to figure out why. If you aren’t, you need to figure out why not. That’s the point of the critique – to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the argument. It’s hard to decide where to start. Often, the issues of validity and soundness get tangled up. In general, you just have to choose whatever is convenient. In this case, let’s look at soundness first. Do we accept the premises to be true? The first premise seems acceptable. At least I’m willing to give Socrates the benefit of the doubt. The second, however, seems questionable. Does the lack of sensation really imply a similarity to dreamless sleep? It seems to me that (permanent) lack of sensation is different from dreamless sleep in at least one important respect – sleeping includes waking up. Lack of sensation does not. I mean, is it right to say that a corpse, or even a stone – neither of which senses – does something like sleep? The third premise is a conclusion of a sub-argument. Our willingness to accept its truth depends on the soundness of Socrates’s argument for it: 1. Death is to be deprived of all sensation. (Assumption) 2. If no sensation remains, death is like a dreamless sleep. (Assumption) 3. Death is like a dreamless sleep. (From 1 and 2) We’ve already considered the truth of this argument’s premises. We concluded that (1) was fine, but (2) was questionable. What about validity? It seems that this argument is valid. If we accept (1) and (2) we must accept (3). So we are convinced of (3) as much as we are convinced of (2). The fourth premise is an assumption about what humans in general would think. These kinds of generalizations are notoriously difficult to establish. Who’s to say what everyone would think? That said, I think it’s a fairly reasonable assumption that most people would consider a dreamless sleep better than a hum-drum day at the office or a normal night of tossing and turning. I know I would. The fifth premise is another conclusion of a sub-argument, which goes like this: 3.Death is like a dreamless sleep. (From 1 and 2) 4.Anyone will consider a dreamless sleep better than most days and nights. (Assumption) 5.Anyone will consider death better than most days and nights. (From 3 and 4) Is this sound? Clearly the argument is valid. Ignoring any lingering misgivings about (4), then, the argument is as sound as (3), whose acceptance depends on (2), as we said above. The only major problem identified, so far, is with (2). This does raise an interesting point, though. What if we compare death – non-existence – to the days of our lives? It just might be that a state of death – lacking all sensation, including pain and suffering – might be better than some of our days, though certainly worse than more pleasurable ones. Perhaps, then, death is not something to seek, but also not something to fear. The sixth premise is another assumption I’m willing to grant Socrates. People might disagree about what the definition of â€Å"blessing† is, but Socrates’s seems reasonable enough. Now, on to the conclusion. Is the argument valid? Do (3), (5), and (6) lead to (7)? Well, not quite. Properly speaking they only support the claim that â€Å"Anyone will consider death to be a blessing.† Socrates hasn’t established what death really is, just what people would usually think of it. But perhaps this is splitting hairs. As for soundness, we’ve already accepted (with reservations) (5) and (6). Again, (3), and thus (2), is the major sticking point. We can consider Socrates’s argument sound only if we accept (2). Critiquing an Argument At this point, it’s time to state what we’ve learned about Socartes’ argument in an argument of our own. We’ve ready to write our critique: Socrates’s argument that death is a blessing in the Apology is interesting, but suffers from some weaknesses. As it stands it is not convincing. In the first place, Socrates cannot establish what death really is, but only what people think about it. He never discusses what death is, only what people think about it. Therefore, he cannot reach his intended conclusion. Moreover, the whole argument hinges on whether it is correct to say that lack of sensation is like a dreamless sleep. Sleeping seems to imply the possibility of waking, so it is quite different in this respect from a complete lack of sensation. Is it fair to say that a corpse, or even a stone, is doing something â€Å"like sleeping† just because they cannot sense anything? If we do not accept this assumed analogy, Socrates’s argument does not follow. That said, Socrates does raise the interesting point that death might be compared to the rest of the days of one’s life. In this case, it might be that death is better than some days, but worse than the very best days. If so, then death is perhaps not something to seek, but not something to fear, either. Even if death is not a blessing, perhaps it is not a curse, either. Socrates’s argument does lead us to reconsider our common view of death as something invariably bad and the worst of all possibilities. Note how I’ve first identified the conclusion and said what I think about the argument as a whole. Since I don’t think the argument is good, I’ve said why I think so. In particular, I point out two important weaknesses, I say why they are weaknesses, and I say which is more problematic. I then comment on what I think is a strength of the argument, and why I think it is a strength. Finally, I summarize what I draw from the argument. Now, an argument critique should contain all of these elements, though not necessarily in this order. Most importantly, an argument critique has to say what the strengths and weaknesses of an argument are, and why they are strengths and weaknesses.

Manufacturing process of pizza

Manufacturing process of pizza Operations Our products at Prima Pizza will be produced in the kitchen area of the premises whilst our services will be offered at the front. Prima Pizza will adopt two main types of production. The first will be line production, as our pizzas will be made fresh, there will be a line of production. This is will be the employees that shape the dough into pizza bases. They will then pass the bases onto the employees that will add the required toppings onto the pizza and place them in the oven. The second method of production is batch production. This method will be used when producing the dough used for the pizza bases. Each day a set amount of dough will be made in order to satisfy customer demand. As dough can be stored overnight there will be no risk of over production or wastage. There will be three sets of batch production one for each size pizza. A number of measures will need to be taken to ensure Prima Pizza delivers the highest quality to its customers. There are many different ways to implement this. As Prima Pizza also offers a delivery service, our quality control will need to expand to outside of the business premises. Quality will ensure customer satisfaction and also save money. Quality control must be implemented in all aspects of the business and used by all employees. These techniques will include using all material responsibly and therefore reducing scrap material and wastage. The products must also be made to a certain quality level, if this is not done, products may have to be made again to satisfy customers. External quality control is also very important. Prima Pizza must maintain its quality even if the product has left the premises. This is especially important on deliveries, as the food must be of the same quality when it leaves the premises and when it arrives at its destination. Prima Pizza has estimated that from ordering a product it will take no longer than 20 minutes for the finished product to be made and given to the customer. We have estimated that for products on delivery the time will be no more than 45 minutes. Fresh goods will be delivered to Prima Pizzas premises everyday; this will include the majority of the pizza toppings and meat produce. Prima pizza will pride itself in ensuring that all our products are the freshest, and therefore the tastiest. Deliveries will be made every morning before the business opens. Other raw materials will be delivered twice a week depending on future product demand and stored in refrigerators or freezers. All employees must deliver our products to customers in a friendly and professional manner. This will be achieved by training our employees to focus on being customer friendly. Products must also be presented in attractive packaging that must remain undamaged. Manufacturing Methods There will be a range of activities involved in transforming raw materials into Prima Pizzas finished goods and then delivering the product to the customer. This cycle involves different stages, which include: inbound logistics, operations, and outbound logistics. Manufacturing process for a pizza: Goods received- raw materials required for the manufacture of pizza bases and the tomato base sauce. Mix dough ingredients. Blend tomatoes together. Kneaded in the dough machine. Mix all the ingredients for base sauce. Storing the dough balls in the right temperature for base. Store the tomato base sauce ready for use. Finished goods: dough ready to be rolled out into base. Apply tomato sauce onto base then add required toppings. Logistics Logistics is the process in which goods are transformed into products ready for customers. Prima Pizzas logistics will involve the regular delivery of goods that through a process of stages will eventually become ready for consumption. Logistics can be split into two, inbound logistics and outbound logistics. These two types, mentioned in more detail later on, are very different. Inbound logistics is the transportation and storage of the raw materials. Outbound logistics is based on the process of transferring the finished goods to the customers. Logistics is very important when running a business. Very often the outcome of a new business is determined by how well their logistics system works. Inbound Logistics This involves receiving our raw materials from the suppliers. The suppliers will deliver fresh goods daily to the business premises. When the goods are received all the employees on shift will help sort and store the received goods. The majority of the raw materials will be stored in the kitchen refrigerators ready to be used. Operations The raw materials will be transformed into the finished products. The dough ingredients will be put into the dough mixer and on completion will be ready to be made into the pizza bases. The topping will be removed from the refrigerators and distributed into containers ready to be used. Outbound Logistics The activity will include two aspects of Prima Pizza. As the business is a fast food takeaway, the products will be served at the counter. As this time the customer can choose to either eat-in of take the product away with them. Delivery service will an important part of Prima Pizzas service. To enable us to provide the pizzas at the highest quality, we must ensure that the packaging used to will keep the product in the same condition it was when it was first made. We will also aim to minimize the travel time it takes to get to the destination.

From Hacking to Cyber Terrorism Essay -- Computers Software Hackers Es

From Hacking to Cyber Terrorism Introduction Information technology (IT) is evolving everyday and our day-to-day life is becoming more and more dependent on it. In this twenty first century, we cannot imagine ourselves without emails, online banking systems and health care systems and without World Wide Web. In other words, evolution of IT has given a modern, technologically advanced and convenient life to the society. But, over the time we are also observing explosive growth in the darker side of the IT - regarding hacking and cyber crimes. Activities like unauthorized computer intrusion, denial of service (DOS), stealing computer passwords and secure data; causing damage to computer systems and databases and causing damage to individuals/society are not very rare these days. As we go further on this paper, we will see different aspects of hacking, from harmless (simply looking around thru web) to dangerously harmful (cyber-terrorism). Irrespective of harmless or harmful, we need to understand is it ethical and how does it impact the global world. This paper is intended to discuss the ethical issues and moral values involved with this darker side of information technology. This paper also includes discussion on the good side of hacking and how hacking can lead to serious cyber crimes and causes harm to world community. What is a computer hacker? The definition of the computer hacker can be described as follows, 1. In programming, a computing enthusiast. The term is normally applied to people who take a delight in experimenting with system hardware (the electronics), software (computer programs) and communication systems (telephone lines, computer networks etc). 1 2. In data (information... ...Security† - Dorothy Denning and Frank Drake, From Chapter 2, Computers, Ethics and Social values by Johnson and Nissenbaum. 5. â€Å"Computer Security and computer crimes† From Chapter 7, Case Studies in Information and computer ethics by Richard Spinello 6. Hacker Crackdown - By Bruce Sterling http://www.lysator.liu.se/etexts/hacker/ 7. Computer Hacking and Ethics by Brian Harvey http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~bh/hackers.html 8. Hacking: Ethical Issues of the Internet Revolution http://blacksun.box.sk/tutorials.php/id/155 9. Cyber-terrorism http://www-cs.etsu-tn.edu/gotterbarn/stdntppr/ 10. â€Å"Frameworks of ethical analysis â€Å" From Chapter 2, Case Studies in information and computer ethics by Richard Spinello 11. Soren Kierkegaard http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kierkegaard 12. Are hackers terrorists? http://zdnet.com.com/2102-11-528326.html